Disclaimer: This is not to the III%,
who are worth their salt.
I hate these two phrases more than
anything else uttered on the face of the Earth in any language, and
no, it's not even for the usual righteously indignant, “can't stand
the fluffy-bunnies” reasons, either.
I hate them because every time I hear
them or read them, the person saying or writing them never – and I
do mean invariably NEVER – has any real idea of what they're
even talking about.
I would know.
Let's start with the latter phrase,
“life is hard,” shall we?
This is almost always spoken by
somebody on food stamps, or some other public assistance, and/or
spends roughly $400 a month or more on their groceries, at least.
They also still have enough money for gas, buying a few DVDs here and
there, or some music off iTunes, new shoes, new clothes, and can go
out every so often with friends, maybe even somewhere out of town for
vacation. They indulge in things like chocolate, and cream and sugar
with their coffee.
My monthly stipend for food is $40 a
month. It has been for the past handful of years now, and it's not
going to change. My husband, the family cook, plans out meals for
the whole month, so that we don't run out. $40 is a good as it gets.
No movies, no music, no new books, no
new swag. No new anything that we don't absolutely need.
“Life is hard,” is NOTHING that I
want to hear from some other woman in a cute top, blinking at me with
mascara on her lashes, with her over-fed brood in nikes and
winter coats, stuffing their shopping carts with cheese and chips and
cereal, going home in their gassed-up mini-van, to their
air-conditioned/centrally heated home where they will watch TV, gripe
over something someone said on facebook, and go to bed snug as a bug
(and that's only ONE example of the variety of folks with no idea).
DO NOT EVER TELL ME YOUR LIFE IS
HARD.
I KNOW what hard life is.
I live and thrive on $40 a month.
Chances are, you can't do what I do. If you would like to, I'll see
you in Idaho. Otherwise, stop seeking sympathy or pity, I have none
to spare in this arena, and it should be very evident as to
why.
… And I hate having to pull out the
“hard-life” ruler, it's tacky and time-consuming, really. It
never makes me feel any better, either.
Next phrase, “Go Green.” The social
engineering slogan that is all talk, no walk, targets the WRONG
people for environmental culpability, and is at best a flat out joke.
Do people actually think that the true
culprits of pollution, the big mega-corporations, are going to be
swayed from their profiteering practices by a few bleeding hearts in
green t-shirts? If so, please keep them far away from me.
The Greenwashed masses always talk
about getting back to nature, saving energy, helping the Earth... but
what do they actually DO about it, really?
Getting back to nature typically
doesn't happen. People are scared to death of Nature. You mention
foraging or hunting and fishing to these folks and you're looked at
as though you're some kind of backwards savage. Why do all that
stuff, when you can just go buy organic from big natural food
brands at big natural foods' stores that are actually owned by even
bigger companies that push the artificial-crap-posing-as-food brands
that they own right alongside their “good stuff”? Heaven forbid,
you might get dirty! Or miss American Idol! Cooking from scratch
takes too much time! And skinning and gutting is ICKYYYYYYY!
They continue to drink fluoridated
water and put aspartame in their drinks, too, it's so quaint.
Really, though, foraging and hunting =
it DOESN'T GET any more “organic” and “all-natural” than
this!
But no, it is as I quote from one of my
neighbors as he said of some plants in our yard, “Why would you
want save them? Those are weeds!” So genuinely flabbergasted
was he, that we would spare a bunch of unsightly weeds (the awful
horror). My husband then educated him on the fact that it was
burdock. Burdock root is also known as “gobo.”
As I recall, he didn't have much to say
beyond a few grumbles about that. But back he went to his
perfectly manicured, big empty lawn, with it's few ornamentals here
and there and not a single “weed” in sight, edible or otherwise.
It continues to remain to this day the very envy of golf-course-esque
backyard lawns everywhere.
Recycling is good. But those
fluorescent bulbs that are supposedly so great are actually
manufactured with mercury, and are highly toxic to the earth, not to
mention the spectrum they emit has been proven for years now to
weaken people who are directly exposed to it for prolonged periods of
time, making them lethargic and unfocused. Makes you wonder why they
make it mandatory and “code” to have it schools and office
buildings, doesn't it? Not only that, if one breaks, it literally
requires a haz-mat team to clean up, I exaggerate not, look it up.
Natural light from a window by day,
incandescent fixture by night for me, please and thank you, until we
can find something that actually IS better.
Ever notice that the go-greeners often
tend to spend a lot, as well? Buying expensive organic food, expensive
imported “natural fiber” clothes, expensive “hybrid”
vehicles, expensive “natural” personal hygiene products (which
may or may not actually be as the label-marketing touts),
mineral makeup, and on and on.
But here's me, with my all-natural food
that I got first-hand with my husband, no processing beyond water and
a knife-blade. My face bears no makeup, doesn't need it, except
maybe a little lip color for out in public. I sit basking in the view
of the autumn sky, bright even with illuminated cloud cover, and I'm
in comfortable clothes that I've managed to make last for nearly five
years. No money spent, there, no resources wasted, and no pollution.
I don't need to “go green.” I
already live as green as it gets, without even trying. So all the
folks wailing with their anti-humanity pro-cuddly-animals-and-flowers
crap can go re-evaluate themselves and the way that THEY choose to
live, thank you.
Some people think that if we pulled food stamps and welfare and immediately cut it off that people would suffer immensely, and that some folks would even die.
ReplyDeleteSome might. And there would likely be riots. Mostly from inner city trash that all of a sudden has their XBOX 360 fund cut off.
Sometimes the tough choices are the right ones. That's why they're called 'tough choices'. Notice they aren't called 'easy choices'.
It's like the old saw, of if you could put a bullet into the head of unborn baby Hitler's mother and prevent the holocaust, would you do it? Always interesting to see what people's answers are. There is really no right answer to that one, it's all perception, and anything can be justified for the 'greater good'. It's amazing how many 'Good Christians' said they'd kill innocent little baby Hitler, and his mother, before he was even born. Before he even had a thought, yet committed a crime. The end justifies the means, apparently. Is that the society that we want to live in? One that would murder us in cold blood when we are young and innocent, because we might commit a crime in the future?
Notice that no one suggested trying to mentor the young Hitler to be something different. Or maybe to encourage his artistic side and further develop it so he wouldn't have been rejected. That alone would have changed history. But all people can suggest is the murder of an innocent unborn.
That's what kind of mental boxes these people live, breed, and eventually, die in.
Such are the self imposed, but .gov encouraged mental boxes that most of the folks on welfare have. They can't see any way out, because most truly do not WANT any way out.
I don't refer to the rare Patriot who does what they can to get their family through hard times, and may have not had the chance to consider alternative ways of feeding their families, but rather people who seriously have no want or desire to ever change their situation.
We all must make the tough choices, and sooner rather than later. If we can't even feed our own families without .gov intervention, what serious chance do we ever have of being free and living in Rightful Liberty?